|
|
| A First Look - Bryston BDP-1
Digital Music Player |
by David McCallum
Bryston is about to launch a new Media
Player designed for the Hi-Fi enthusiast that isn’t like any
other computer-based, media-server type product I’ve seen. The
concept is new, the design is pure Bryston and last week I got to spend
five hours with the prototype of the soon to be launched BDP-1 Bryston
Digital Player. In typical Bryston style, the new player produces clean,
resolute & dynamic
music. The most interesting thing, however, might not be how good it
sounds, but what the BDP-1 does. Here’s a first look at what
I discovered.
The Bryston BDP-1 is a digital audio player that plays music from
a USB hard drive or USB Thumbdrive rather than a disc, designed specifically
for playing high-resolution music within a two channel Hi-Fi stereo
system. It plays digital audio from a USB drive and outputs a digital
audio signal to an external D/A, just like a CD transport; instead
of being stored on a disc, the music is stored on a USB drive. The
media is stored, organized and arranged on the USB drive by the user
(the BDP-1 does not come with an internal hard drive), and the player
can access up to four different USB drive devices at any one time.
Once a USB drive is attached, the BDP-1 is able to play multiple
audio file types including AIFF, WAV, FLAC, MP3, M4A, WMA, with sampling
frequencies of 44.1 KHz, 48 KHz, 88.2 KHz, 96 KHz, 176.4 KHz & 192
KHz, and bit depths of 16b & 24b, converting computer audio files
into digital audio for output to a D/A converter via either AES-EBU
or SPIDF (BNC) digital signal formats.
The BDP-1 can be controlled using one of four different methods:
- Directly from the player via front panel controls and display.
- Using
a Bryston remote control for Play, Pause, Stop, Next and Previous
(with Song and Artist viewable from the front panel display)
- A
computer using a web-browser (EX Firefox/Minion or Bryston MAX)
- A
Remote wireless device such as iPhone ™, iTouch ™,
iPad ™ (Using MPoD or Bryston MINI)
Control of the player from the front panel and the Bryston
remote control is simple, with functions very similar to
a CD player. However, substantially more interactivity
is available through the options of using a computer or
a remote wireless device.
In order to be operated by a computer or remote wireless
device such as an iPhone™, the BDP-1 needs to be connected to
a router within a wireless home network. This connection is made
with a hard-wired Ethernet cable that runs between the BDP-1
and a router attached to a wireless network. Once connected to
a network, third-party applications are used to interact with
the BDP-1, the hard drive discs connected to it, and the audio
files on those drives.
I experimented with two third-party music player applications:
Minion and MPoD. Both are available for use with Apple’s iPhone™,
iPod touch™ and iPad™. Minion also offers a web-browser
via Firefox for use with a computer. Although I didn’t
spend enough time with either app to be able to offer a thorough
evaluation, I was impressed by how smoothly they integrated with
the BDP-1. Once connected to my wireless network, the system
functioned easily and efficiently, allowing me to see all of
the hard drives, folders and music that I had prepped for the
session.
In addition to these third-party applications, Bryston
is also working on the development of a web browser called “Bryston MAX” & an
application for remote control called “Bryston MINI.” The
prototype’s for these two features were still rudimentary
but effective, showing a lot of promise. My early guess is that
owners of the BDP-1 will want to use one or both of these two
features to control the BDP-1.
Once the unit was completely connected the real Hi-Fi fun
began. With two USB hard drives, one USB Thumbdrive and
wireless control in place, I started toggling through the
folders with an iPad™ running
MPoD. With this application switching between tracks was a breeze.
In anticipation of the listening session I had prepared a hard drive
with a lot of music on it, including my entire Beatles & Bob
Dylan box sets, numerous high-resolution audio downloads from 96khz
to 192khz, and many of my favorite albums and songs. The MPoD feature
allowed me to prepare lists, or to simply switch between songs on
the fly. While I didn’t have a significant amount of time
for listening, I did get to play most of the tracks in my test-music
library, without having to switch between multiple cds or toggle
through tracks on a burned disc. The bottom line is that I was
able to listen to a lot of music, and if time allowed I had hundreds
of hours of music readily available at my fingertips.
In terms of its Hi-Fi performance, out of the box the prototype
BDP-1 sounded excellent. Connected to the Bryston
BDA-1 D/A converter I
reviewed in early 2010 the
system sounded rich, full and very musical. I look forward
to an extended listening session when it is ready for release.
I recognize that there are a number of media servers or
hard drive based players designed for the Hi-Fi enthusiast
already on the market, and some of them offer more features
or greater functionality than Bryston’s design. I also recognize that some basic computer
skills are required in order to both prepare and use the BDP-1 Player,
which may result in resistance from many hard-core audiophiles. But
ultimately the strength of the BDP-1 lies in the simplicity and quality
of its design concept. While it is a computer-based audio product,
it isn’t a music server or a computer being used to play music;
the BDP-1 is exactly what Bryston has called it - a music player.
It doesn’t store, rip, or organize your music. It simply
plays the music at the highest technical standard available today.
I think Bryston has set out to do the same thing they did
when they built their first CD player; build a product
that maximizes the sonic capability of the platform, while
building a device that is simple to use. In this regard
the BDP-1 gets full marks. How it compares to other such
products requires a more thorough critique of its technical
operation and a more detailed assessment of its sonic performance.
I look forward to addressing these questions in a full
review, which hopefully will appear later this fall. For
now, after a first glance my enthusiasm is quite high,
and I strongly suggest you watch the horizon for the BDP-1
Bryston Digital Player.
Thumb drives range in price from about $10-$200 depending
on the amount of storage space. Hard drives cost between
$50-$300 also depending on storage space. A $300.00 hard
drive would get you about 2 Terabytes of storage, which
could hold about 2500-3000 full resolution 44.1/16 bit
CD’s.
Editor’s Note
I asked James
Tanner, Bryston’s marketing executive, to come
over to my house and listen to some prototype (very) high-end speaker
cables and interconnects in a system with Bryston 7B SST squared
amplifiers. He came and brought the BDP-1 along. This provided the
opportunity to listen to this rather new source component — and
I am totally impressed. The USB Thumbdrive held some of my usual
listening material with which I am intimately familiar and, strictly
from an audio perspective, I couldn’t hear the difference between
my CD player/DAC/Clock arrangement and the BDP-1. The Bryston DAC
was used for these auditions. I am not the a savvy digital interface
user like David, nor do I know enough about its technology, but I
must admit that the unit’s audio performance was astoundingly
high-end — nothing short of stunning. I regard the BDP-1 as
the most innovative source component I have ever come across. I do
not know why, but it seems that the unit is quite capable to “extract” the
all-important harmonics better than most CD player I have listened
to. Perhaps it is the absence or limited timing errors caused by
CD transports; perhaps it is its discrete circuitry — whatever
it is, this is the future of digital source components— and
it’s available now. The price (suggested $2200) is right, the
technology is up to date now and it is ready for updates when technology
advances further. All I can say is : I want one.
|
| Editor's Notes - Rule Your
Listening Room |
The Sanctuary — Controlled
It's
a sacred place, it's a guarded retreat, it's a haven, and it's
in your house — it’s the listening room. My own
main listening room is the living room and, like it or not, I'm
sharing it with other members of the family and visitors. Yet,
it becomes my private sanctuary when I'm listening to music and
try to relax. However, it's difficult to relax when my audio isn't
right and even a small imperfection becomes a big distraction.
I'm willing to bet that most audiophiles have experienced uncertainty
and suspicions about their choices of audio gear and, let's face
it, that's why they are always on the hunt for methods and components
to improve the sound. When, after you have purchased expensive
cables, AC cords, power line conditioners, speakers and electronics,
the sound isn't quite what you expected, look around and you'll
find yourself IN the one component that directly affects the sound,
namely, your listening room; or more precisely its acoustics.
Acoustics is a word derived from the Greek word Acouin — to
hear — and it's a complex science quite evident when we look
at some of the famous concert halls — the good ones and the
bad ones. We have a fairly deficient one right here in Toronto — Roy
Thompson Hall — and we have a few real good ones as well — the
old Massey Hall and the Living Arts Centre in Mississauga, a
suburb of Toronto. I can't understand why Roy Thompson — built
in 1992 — wasn't designed properly; after all, 20th century's
technology made analyzing acoustic properties as easy as a decent
spectrum analyzer. Many more measuring instruments and computer programs
are now obtainable, but, sadly, they lack the most sophisticated
tool needed to get acoustics right — ears. A dog’s ears
would be great, but human ears will do just fine. Roy Thompson Hall
is a nice building to be sure, but it is a terrible listening environment;
and yours could be too, if you don't follow very basic rules and
don't use the very best measuring devices possible — ears.
To correct the problem in any listening environment, a bit of logic,
lots of patience and some furniture may well be all you need.
First, the logic
Let’s acknowledge that we all have things in common; we listen
in a room with walls, a floor and a ceiling. Like any component in
the audio chain, the room too has a voice; some rooms are alive with
reverberations (echo), some are dull sounding and require spirit
or liveliness. Almost every listening environment needs some work
to achieve the proper balance of two important elements — absorption
and reflection.
This is where a little logic is needed — and this usually
spells compromise. The audiophile and other family members (mainly
the lady of the house) need to make concessions and come to a mutually
satisfying arrangement. Arrangement is the working word, of course,
inasmuch as the next step may be to re-arrange some of the listening
room's furniture.
The Guidelines
Before you do anything, you should familiarize yourself with the
room's (the component's) "voice". A look around will tell
what kind of listening environment you are dealing with. Carpet on
the floor is a good thing — it will prevent upward reflections.
However, you should know that densely knitted or woven carpets made
of wool have a better absorption rate than carpets made with artificial
fibres; and absorption is desirable in most environments. If the
listening room has bare (hardwood) floors, the situation becomes
a bit sticky, but not impossible to deal with. Adding a carpet or
a rug usually does a good job. Other tricky environments are living
rooms featuring ”open concept” designs. Open concept
means spaces open to the kitchen, dining room or some other areas.
Open means trouble, loads of trouble, for it is difficult to place
the loudspeakers appropriately to achieve proper imaging. Higher
than 12-foot ceilings also spells trouble, specifically, bass trouble — lacking
proper bass response. The only remedy for this is to elevate the
loudspeakers to the required height — it's either that or lowering
the ceiling, nothing else will do. If you can't lower the ceiling
or elevate a large set of loudspeakers, you can try to using some
of Art Noxon's ASC corner traps, up close to the ceiling. I made
it work for me when I lived in an "open concept" town
house with a 22-foot ceiling.
Square rooms are nothing but a pain, and it's not only in your ears.
However, even this can be corrected if you are willing to follow
my advice. To make the following as comprehensible as possible, I'll
describe my listening studio also known as the living/dining room
area I have used for over 15 years.
My room's total length is almost 28 feet; about 11 feet of this
is dining area divided by short walls jutting out about three feet
on either side. The 11-foot space accommodates four chairs and
a glass-topped table, while in the corners created by the short
walls I placed a vibration-free Core component shelf (reviewed
in Vol.17, No. 1 of the print mag). The main listening area and
my additional set-up is in the 17-foot space created by aforementioned
short walls. A leather sofa, a couple of leather chairs, an ottoman,
another component shelf, coffee table and an 1934 radio/record
player console (for some of my components and for CD storage space)
occupies this space. On the carpeted floor, I always arrange loudspeakers
just ahead of the jutting walls, which naturally divide this room
into about one/third segments. All loudspeakers I audition and
or review are placed one third into the listening space (room),
and I regard this placement as an important part to let the loudspeakers "breathe" and
to recreate the front-to-back dimension of a sound stage.
Look at your set-up, divide your (listening) room into three equal
segments (approximately) and try to place the loudspeakers in one
of the two (invisible) boundaries thus created. This very simple
step will render an instant improvement as you have just created
a deep sound stage (I get about 11 feet of it). The loudspeakers
should be placed equal distances from the sidewalls, if possible
about three feet away from the sidewalls. If you must place them
closer to the wall, toe them in by a few degrees, not too much,
as this affects the width of the sound stage you wish to create.
(If the speakers are toed in too much, you‘ll shrink the sound
stage, the horizontal spread). In addition to a much-improved sound
stage, this set-up eliminates most corner reflections and undesirable
bass augmentation. The one-third dividing method works all the time,
and with every loudspeaker system ever designed, including dipolar,
bipolar and electrostatic loudspeakers. However, the plan is not
written in stone and, if not feasible, pull those loudspeakers away
from the back wall as far as practicable — it will help,
though the closer to the rear wall the shallower the sound stage.
As anyone who has attended trade-shows can tell you, small and
or square rooms pose the most difficult problems — standing
waves everywhere. (Standing waves are stationary orders of alternating
zones of high and low energy (antinodes and nodes) set up in an
acoustical space when reflections between its boundaries are in
synchronism). Most professionals in the industry know this and
I respect those who have overcome acoustic problems in square rooms,
but I can't understand why there still are quite a few pros who
fail to set up systems correctly.
If you have a small and or square listening room, don't despair,
the problem can be remedied. Use the corners of the room to your
advantage by placing the loudspeakers so that they face (diagonally)
the other corner. Arrange your electronics, either behind the loudspeakers
on a shelf or somewhere accessible in the room. Remember that the
classic set-up is with the source components and preamplifier away
from the power amplifier(s). I recommend a 20-foot run of interconnects
and an eight-foot run of speaker cables if power and preamps are
used. It isn't a mortal sin to place the electronics between the
loudspeakers (on a stand), if you must. If you have an integrated
amp, keep it close to the loudspeakers so that you can use an eight-foot
pair of speaker cables. Many years ago Bruce Brisson of MIT fame
published a paper in which he maintained that an eight foot run
of speaker cable avoids impairing phase shifts — a timing
error through a part of the frequency range of a signal comparative
to the remainder of its range. And many years ago, I put the theory
to the test just to discover that Brisson was right.
To gain sound stage depth and enhance focus (on the performers),
cotton and wool fabric curtains on the rear wall behind the loudspeakers
will do a very good job. I have used fabric-covered vertical blinds
with excellent results. They can be pulled back or rotated, thus
providing the balance between absorption and reflection. The adjustments
come in handy as the blinds' angle can be changed to accommodate
various acoustical scenarios such as how many "absorbing bodies" (listeners)
are in the listening area. Here is where you should trust your ears
and adjust accordingly. If curtains or drapes aren’t feasible,
tapestry or other (textile) wall-hanging behind the speakers on
the rear wall will help.
What not to do
Don't use any hard, reflecting diffusers behind the speakers; don't
place absorbing panels or furnishings next to, or outside of the
speakers — it
will diminish the tweeters' performance.
Don't use synthetic fabrics for curtains or rugs, if possible — it
works, but with limited success.
Do not treat the walls facing the loudspeakers (the listening area).
It is my belief that sound should bounce off the wall behind the
listening seats, return toward the opposing wall, where it should
be absorbed. This will re-capture ambiance (if properly recorded)
and take you to the original recording venue.
Testing the results of you arrangement
Fire up the system, sit down on your "listening chair",
and then stand up. If the focus on the stage has changed, you got
it wrong, but if focus has remained steadfast and you can clearly
determine the sound stage boundaries, things are in decent order.
Next, walk slowly toward the stage. If you have correctly arranged
the speakers, focus on instruments and voices should remain firm
as you walk closer to the speakers and you should have the impression
that you are walking closer to the stage where the musicians are
performing. Next, stand outside the room near its entrance and
listen carefully. If you can still make out the location of the
sound stage, pad yourself on the shoulder, you have become an acoustic
expert without even a glance at a spectrum analyzer.
I'd like to stress, that all of the above is not predicated in the
complicated science of acoustics, but is rooted in hands-on experience
which, incidentally, seems to work better than most science-based
methods I've checked out. At any rate, get the help of a friend and
try my simple method for your audio set-up. You may find that you
are quite able to rule your listening environment and enjoy the music
more than ever.

Have a great musical day,
EF |
| From The Editor |
About The Inner Ear – A little background, philosophy
and mind-set.
The Inner Ear has been around
since September of 1986, though in the beginning and for some years
following it was called The Inner Ear Report. The first print version
was the format of the TV Guide magazine and, I thought, the format
of other reputable audio mags, such as TAS and ‘Phile. TIER,
as it became known, was a Canadian publication, founded because I am
a casual audiophile and a hard-core music lover — and I had worked
in the industry since 1963 (or was it 64?). My first job in the business
was in retail sales for a small boutique and a short time later, I
landed a position with a major retailer. I made manager, but eventually
left and ventured into wholesale and distribution. After having traveled
North America for a few years, I decided to return to retail, specializing
in high-end audio. << READ MORE >> |
| Latest Audio News & Reviews |
|
|
|
|
|