Inner Ear Magazine - Discover High End
Latest Audio News Inner Ear editorialists sound off Inner Ear Magazine product reviews Inner Ear Magazine's Archives Inner Ear Magazine's audio deals Inner Ear Magazine contact info Inner Ear Magazine - Discover High End
Audio Basics, Maple, Ontario
A First Look - Bryston BDP-1 Digital Music Player
by David McCallum

Bryston is about to launch a new Media Player designed for the Hi-Fi enthusiast that isn’t like any other computer-based, media-server type product I’ve seen. The concept is new, the design is pure Bryston and last week I got to spend five hours with the prototype of the soon to be launched BDP-1 Bryston Digital Player. In typical Bryston style, the new player produces clean, resolute & dynamic music. The most interesting thing, however, might not be how good it sounds, but what the BDP-1 does. Here’s a first look at what I discovered.

The Bryston BDP-1 is a digital audio player that plays music from a USB hard drive or USB Thumbdrive rather than a disc, designed specifically for playing high-resolution music within a two channel Hi-Fi stereo system. It plays digital audio from a USB drive and outputs a digital audio signal to an external D/A, just like a CD transport; instead of being stored on a disc, the music is stored on a USB drive. The media is stored, organized and arranged on the USB drive by the user (the BDP-1 does not come with an internal hard drive), and the player can access up to four different USB drive devices at any one time.

Once a USB drive is attached, the BDP-1 is able to play multiple audio file types including AIFF, WAV, FLAC, MP3, M4A, WMA, with sampling frequencies of 44.1 KHz, 48 KHz, 88.2 KHz, 96 KHz, 176.4 KHz & 192 KHz, and bit depths of 16b & 24b, converting computer audio files into digital audio for output to a D/A converter via either AES-EBU or SPIDF (BNC) digital signal formats.

The BDP-1 can be controlled using one of four different methods:

  1. Directly from the player via front panel controls and display.
  2. Using a Bryston remote control for Play, Pause, Stop, Next and Previous (with Song and Artist viewable from the front panel display)
  3. A computer using a web-browser (EX Firefox/Minion or Bryston MAX)
  4. A Remote wireless device such as iPhone ™, iTouch ™, iPad ™ (Using MPoD or Bryston MINI)
Control of the player from the front panel and the Bryston remote control is simple, with functions very similar to a CD player. However, substantially more interactivity is available through the options of using a computer or a remote wireless device.

In order to be operated by a computer or remote wireless device such as an iPhone™, the BDP-1 needs to be connected to a router within a wireless home network. This connection is made with a hard-wired Ethernet cable that runs between the BDP-1 and a router attached to a wireless network. Once connected to a network, third-party applications are used to interact with the BDP-1, the hard drive discs connected to it, and the audio files on those drives.

I experimented with two third-party music player applications: Minion and MPoD. Both are available for use with Apple’s iPhone™, iPod touch™ and iPad™. Minion also offers a web-browser via Firefox for use with a computer. Although I didn’t spend enough time with either app to be able to offer a thorough evaluation, I was impressed by how smoothly they integrated with the BDP-1. Once connected to my wireless network, the system functioned easily and efficiently, allowing me to see all of the hard drives, folders and music that I had prepped for the session.

In addition to these third-party applications, Bryston is also working on the development of a web browser called “Bryston MAX” & an application for remote control called “Bryston MINI.” The prototype’s for these two features were still rudimentary but effective, showing a lot of promise. My early guess is that owners of the BDP-1 will want to use one or both of these two features to control the BDP-1.

Once the unit was completely connected the real Hi-Fi fun began. With two USB hard drives, one USB Thumbdrive and wireless control in place, I started toggling through the folders with an iPad™ running MPoD. With this application switching between tracks was a breeze. In anticipation of the listening session I had prepared a hard drive with a lot of music on it, including my entire Beatles & Bob Dylan box sets, numerous high-resolution audio downloads from 96khz to 192khz, and many of my favorite albums and songs. The MPoD feature allowed me to prepare lists, or to simply switch between songs on the fly. While I didn’t have a significant amount of time for listening, I did get to play most of the tracks in my test-music library, without having to switch between multiple cds or toggle through tracks on a burned disc. The bottom line is that I was able to listen to a lot of music, and if time allowed I had hundreds of hours of music readily available at my fingertips.

In terms of its Hi-Fi performance, out of the box the prototype BDP-1 sounded excellent. Connected to the Bryston BDA-1 D/A converter I reviewed in early 2010 the system sounded rich, full and very musical. I look forward to an extended listening session when it is ready for release.

I recognize that there are a number of media servers or hard drive based players designed for the Hi-Fi enthusiast already on the market, and some of them offer more features or greater functionality than Bryston’s design. I also recognize that some basic computer skills are required in order to both prepare and use the BDP-1 Player, which may result in resistance from many hard-core audiophiles. But ultimately the strength of the BDP-1 lies in the simplicity and quality of its design concept. While it is a computer-based audio product, it isn’t a music server or a computer being used to play music; the BDP-1 is exactly what Bryston has called it - a music player. It doesn’t store, rip, or organize your music. It simply plays the music at the highest technical standard available today.

I think Bryston has set out to do the same thing they did when they built their first CD player; build a product that maximizes the sonic capability of the platform, while building a device that is simple to use. In this regard the BDP-1 gets full marks. How it compares to other such products requires a more thorough critique of its technical operation and a more detailed assessment of its sonic performance. I look forward to addressing these questions in a full review, which hopefully will appear later this fall. For now, after a first glance my enthusiasm is quite high, and I strongly suggest you watch the horizon for the BDP-1 Bryston Digital Player.

Thumb drives range in price from about $10-$200 depending on the amount of storage space. Hard drives cost between $50-$300 also depending on storage space. A $300.00 hard drive would get you about 2 Terabytes of storage, which could hold about 2500-3000 full resolution 44.1/16 bit CD’s.

Editor’s Note
I asked James Tanner, Bryston’s marketing executive, to come over to my house and listen to some prototype (very) high-end speaker cables and interconnects in a system with Bryston 7B SST squared amplifiers. He came and brought the BDP-1 along. This provided the opportunity to listen to this rather new source component — and I am totally impressed. The USB Thumbdrive held some of my usual listening material with which I am intimately familiar and, strictly from an audio perspective, I couldn’t hear the difference between my CD player/DAC/Clock arrangement and the BDP-1. The Bryston DAC was used for these auditions. I am not the a savvy digital interface user like David, nor do I know enough about its technology, but I must admit that the unit’s audio performance was astoundingly high-end — nothing short of stunning. I regard the BDP-1 as the most innovative source component I have ever come across. I do not know why, but it seems that the unit is quite capable to “extract” the all-important harmonics better than most CD player I have listened to. Perhaps it is the absence or limited timing errors caused by CD transports; perhaps it is its discrete circuitry — whatever it is, this is the future of digital source components— and it’s available now. The price (suggested $2200) is right, the technology is up to date now and it is ready for updates when technology advances further. All I can say is : I want one.

Editor's Notes - Rule Your Listening Room

The Sanctuary — Controlled

It's a sacred place, it's a guarded retreat, it's a haven, and it's in your house — it’s the listening room. My own main listening room is the living room and, like it or not, I'm sharing it with other members of the family and visitors. Yet, it becomes my private sanctuary when I'm listening to music and try to relax. However, it's difficult to relax when my audio isn't right and even a small imperfection becomes a big distraction. I'm willing to bet that most audiophiles have experienced uncertainty and suspicions about their choices of audio gear and, let's face it, that's why they are always on the hunt for methods and components to improve the sound. When, after you have purchased expensive cables, AC cords, power line conditioners, speakers and electronics, the sound isn't quite what you expected, look around and you'll find yourself IN the one component that directly affects the sound, namely, your listening room; or more precisely its acoustics.

Acoustics is a word derived from the Greek word Acouin — to hear — and it's a complex science quite evident when we look at some of the famous concert halls — the good ones and the bad ones. We have a fairly deficient one right here in Toronto — Roy Thompson Hall — and we have a few real good ones as well — the old Massey Hall and the Living Arts Centre in Mississauga, a suburb of Toronto. I can't understand why Roy Thompson — built in 1992 — wasn't designed properly; after all, 20th century's technology made analyzing acoustic properties as easy as a decent spectrum analyzer. Many more measuring instruments and computer programs are now obtainable, but, sadly, they lack the most sophisticated tool needed to get acoustics right — ears. A dog’s ears would be great, but human ears will do just fine. Roy Thompson Hall is a nice building to be sure, but it is a terrible listening environment; and yours could be too, if you don't follow very basic rules and don't use the very best measuring devices possible — ears.

To correct the problem in any listening environment, a bit of logic, lots of patience and some furniture may well be all you need.

First, the logic
Let’s acknowledge that we all have things in common; we listen in a room with walls, a floor and a ceiling. Like any component in the audio chain, the room too has a voice; some rooms are alive with reverberations (echo), some are dull sounding and require spirit or liveliness. Almost every listening environment needs some work to achieve the proper balance of two important elements — absorption and reflection.

This is where a little logic is needed — and this usually spells compromise. The audiophile and other family members (mainly the lady of the house) need to make concessions and come to a mutually satisfying arrangement. Arrangement is the working word, of course, inasmuch as the next step may be to re-arrange some of the listening room's furniture.

The Guidelines
Before you do anything, you should familiarize yourself with the room's (the component's) "voice". A look around will tell what kind of listening environment you are dealing with. Carpet on the floor is a good thing — it will prevent upward reflections. However, you should know that densely knitted or woven carpets made of wool have a better absorption rate than carpets made with artificial fibres; and absorption is desirable in most environments. If the listening room has bare (hardwood) floors, the situation becomes a bit sticky, but not impossible to deal with. Adding a carpet or a rug usually does a good job. Other tricky environments are living rooms featuring ”open concept” designs. Open concept means spaces open to the kitchen, dining room or some other areas. Open means trouble, loads of trouble, for it is difficult to place the loudspeakers appropriately to achieve proper imaging. Higher than 12-foot ceilings also spells trouble, specifically, bass trouble — lacking proper bass response. The only remedy for this is to elevate the loudspeakers to the required height — it's either that or lowering the ceiling, nothing else will do. If you can't lower the ceiling or elevate a large set of loudspeakers, you can try to using some of Art Noxon's ASC corner traps, up close to the ceiling. I made it work for me when I lived in an "open concept" town house with a 22-foot ceiling.

Square rooms are nothing but a pain, and it's not only in your ears. However, even this can be corrected if you are willing to follow my advice. To make the following as comprehensible as possible, I'll describe my listening studio also known as the living/dining room area I have used for over 15 years.

My room's total length is almost 28 feet; about 11 feet of this is dining area divided by short walls jutting out about three feet on either side. The 11-foot space accommodates four chairs and a glass-topped table, while in the corners created by the short walls I placed a vibration-free Core component shelf (reviewed in Vol.17, No. 1 of the print mag). The main listening area and my additional set-up is in the 17-foot space created by aforementioned short walls. A leather sofa, a couple of leather chairs, an ottoman, another component shelf, coffee table and an 1934 radio/record player console (for some of my components and for CD storage space) occupies this space. On the carpeted floor, I always arrange loudspeakers just ahead of the jutting walls, which naturally divide this room into about one/third segments. All loudspeakers I audition and or review are placed one third into the listening space (room), and I regard this placement as an important part to let the loudspeakers "breathe" and to recreate the front-to-back dimension of a sound stage.

Look at your set-up, divide your (listening) room into three equal segments (approximately) and try to place the loudspeakers in one of the two (invisible) boundaries thus created. This very simple step will render an instant improvement as you have just created a deep sound stage (I get about 11 feet of it). The loudspeakers should be placed equal distances from the sidewalls, if possible about three feet away from the sidewalls. If you must place them closer to the wall, toe them in by a few degrees, not too much, as this affects the width of the sound stage you wish to create. (If the speakers are toed in too much, you‘ll shrink the sound stage, the horizontal spread). In addition to a much-improved sound stage, this set-up eliminates most corner reflections and undesirable bass augmentation. The one-third dividing method works all the time, and with every loudspeaker system ever designed, including dipolar, bipolar and electrostatic loudspeakers. However, the plan is not written in stone and, if not feasible, pull those loudspeakers away from the back wall as far as practicable — it will help, though the closer to the rear wall the shallower the sound stage.

As anyone who has attended trade-shows can tell you, small and or square rooms pose the most difficult problems — standing waves everywhere. (Standing waves are stationary orders of alternating zones of high and low energy (antinodes and nodes) set up in an acoustical space when reflections between its boundaries are in synchronism). Most professionals in the industry know this and I respect those who have overcome acoustic problems in square rooms, but I can't understand why there still are quite a few pros who fail to set up systems correctly.

If you have a small and or square listening room, don't despair, the problem can be remedied. Use the corners of the room to your advantage by placing the loudspeakers so that they face (diagonally) the other corner. Arrange your electronics, either behind the loudspeakers on a shelf or somewhere accessible in the room. Remember that the classic set-up is with the source components and preamplifier away from the power amplifier(s). I recommend a 20-foot run of interconnects and an eight-foot run of speaker cables if power and preamps are used. It isn't a mortal sin to place the electronics between the loudspeakers (on a stand), if you must. If you have an integrated amp, keep it close to the loudspeakers so that you can use an eight-foot pair of speaker cables. Many years ago Bruce Brisson of MIT fame published a paper in which he maintained that an eight foot run of speaker cable avoids impairing phase shifts — a timing error through a part of the frequency range of a signal comparative to the remainder of its range. And many years ago, I put the theory to the test just to discover that Brisson was right.

To gain sound stage depth and enhance focus (on the performers), cotton and wool fabric curtains on the rear wall behind the loudspeakers will do a very good job. I have used fabric-covered vertical blinds with excellent results. They can be pulled back or rotated, thus providing the balance between absorption and reflection. The adjustments come in handy as the blinds' angle can be changed to accommodate various acoustical scenarios such as how many "absorbing bodies" (listeners) are in the listening area. Here is where you should trust your ears and adjust accordingly. If curtains or drapes aren’t feasible, tapestry or other (textile) wall-hanging behind the speakers on the rear wall will help.

What not to do
Don't use any hard, reflecting diffusers behind the speakers; don't place absorbing panels or furnishings next to, or outside of the speakers — it will diminish the tweeters' performance.

Don't use synthetic fabrics for curtains or rugs, if possible — it works, but with limited success.

Do not treat the walls facing the loudspeakers (the listening area). It is my belief that sound should bounce off the wall behind the listening seats, return toward the opposing wall, where it should be absorbed. This will re-capture ambiance (if properly recorded) and take you to the original recording venue.

Testing the results of you arrangement
Fire up the system, sit down on your "listening chair", and then stand up. If the focus on the stage has changed, you got it wrong, but if focus has remained steadfast and you can clearly determine the sound stage boundaries, things are in decent order. Next, walk slowly toward the stage. If you have correctly arranged the speakers, focus on instruments and voices should remain firm as you walk closer to the speakers and you should have the impression that you are walking closer to the stage where the musicians are performing. Next, stand outside the room near its entrance and listen carefully. If you can still make out the location of the sound stage, pad yourself on the shoulder, you have become an acoustic expert without even a glance at a spectrum analyzer.

I'd like to stress, that all of the above is not predicated in the complicated science of acoustics, but is rooted in hands-on experience which, incidentally, seems to work better than most science-based methods I've checked out. At any rate, get the help of a friend and try my simple method for your audio set-up. You may find that you are quite able to rule your listening environment and enjoy the music more than ever.

Have a great musical day,

EF

From The Editor
About The Inner Ear – A little background, philosophy and mind-set.

The Inner Ear has been around since September of 1986, though in the beginning and for some years following it was called The Inner Ear Report. The first print version was the format of the TV Guide magazine and, I thought, the format of other reputable audio mags, such as TAS and ‘Phile. TIER, as it became known, was a Canadian publication, founded because I am a casual audiophile and a hard-core music lover — and I had worked in the industry since 1963 (or was it 64?). My first job in the business was in retail sales for a small boutique and a short time later, I landed a position with a major retailer. I made manager, but eventually left and ventured into wholesale and distribution. After having traveled North America for a few years, I decided to return to retail, specializing in high-end audio. << READ MORE >>
Latest Audio News & Reviews
   
Einstein would be impressed with the TEAC Esoteric’s handling of the Forth Dimension
by Ernie Fisher
Sophisticated Audio on Steroids: Bryston 4B SST
by Ernie Fisher
VAC Signature Preamplifier Mk II
by Ernie Fisher
Kimber Kable Hero HB Interconnects
by David McCallum
Bryston's new DAC rules as affordable high-end
by David McCallum
Wright On - ModWright LS36.5 Balanced Tube Linestage - No Modes for this preamp
by Ernie Fisher
Visit the Reviews page for a list of all previously posted product reviews
 
 
News | Reviews | Commentary | Marketplace | Contact Us | Home